Storywright compared to other campaign tools
Honest, side-by-side comparisons of Storywright and the tools GMs already use — World Anvil, LegendKeeper, Notion, Kanka, Obsidian, Obsidian Portal, and Google Docs.
Honest, specific comparisons — where each alternative is genuinely stronger, not just where Storywright wins.
How to actually choose a campaign tool
Every campaign tool claims to do everything, so the marketing pages all read the same. The real differences show up in three places: what the tool is actually built around (a wiki you maintain versus a session loop you run), who else at your table needs access, and what happens to your notes if you ever want to leave. These comparisons are built around those three questions instead of a generic feature checklist.
The real decision points
- What is the tool actually built around? World Anvil, LegendKeeper, Kanka, and Obsidian are wikis first — deep, structured world-building with sessions bolted on or absent. Storywright is a session loop first — prep, run, recap — with world notes attached to that loop, not the other way around. Notion and Google Docs are neither; they’re general-purpose documents you structure yourself.
- Do your players need to see any of it? Some tools are GM-only by default, with player access an afterthought or a paid tier. If your players actually reading recaps and catching up between sessions matters to you, the best campaign managers for player participation is the place to start.
- What happens if you switch tools later? Export quality varies enormously — some tools hand you a clean archive, others lock years of notes into a proprietary format. Every comparison below calls this out specifically, because "can I leave" matters more after two years of notes than it does on day one.
When one of the alternatives is the right call
Sometimes it genuinely is. If your table’s whole draw is deep, encyclopedic world lore that outlives any one campaign, a wiki-first tool like World Anvil or LegendKeeper is built for that in a way a session-first tool isn’t trying to be. If you and your group already live in Notion or Obsidian for everything else, the switching cost of a dedicated tool can outweigh what it adds. Each comparison below says plainly where that’s true instead of arguing you out of it.
If you’re still not sure
Storywright is free to start and free for every player at your table, forever — the only paid tier is GM Pro, and there’s no card required to try the free plan. That makes "just try it for a session" a genuinely low-cost way to settle the comparison yourself, rather than taking any single article’s word for it, this one included. JSON export ships on every plan for the same reason the "what happens if you switch tools later" question matters above — trying Storywright shouldn’t be a one-way door either.
These are written by someone who has actually used the alternative, not scraped from its own marketing page — if a claim here is wrong or out of date, the contact page is one click away.
Storywright vs World Anvil
An honest comparison of Storywright and World Anvil for tabletop campaigns: worldbuilding depth vs session-first simplicity, pricing, and player access.
Storywright vs LegendKeeper
Storywright and LegendKeeper compared for running campaigns: worldbuilding wiki vs the session loop, player access, pricing, and data export.
Storywright vs Notion
Storywright and Notion compared for TTRPG campaigns: a blank flexible workspace vs a purpose-built campaign companion, player access, and setup burden.
Storywright vs Kanka
Storywright and Kanka compared for running tabletop campaigns: an open-source worldbuilding wiki vs the session-first loop, player access, and at-table use.
Storywright vs Obsidian
Storywright and Obsidian compared for campaign notes: a local-first linked-note vault vs a shared campaign companion your players can actually use.
Storywright vs Obsidian Portal
Storywright and Obsidian Portal compared: a long-running campaign-site host with wiki + adventure log vs the session-first loop and modern player tools.
Storywright vs Google Docs
Storywright and Google Docs compared for running campaigns: a shared document everyone knows vs a structured, linked campaign companion built for play.
The best campaign managers for player participation (2026)
A buyer’s guide to tabletop campaign managers judged on one axis your players feel every week: how well non-GMs can actually read, contribute, and stay in the story.
Bring it to your real table.
Free to start. Free for your players, forever. JSON export on every plan.